Calculate Cost of a Bad Hire Calculator
A wrong hire costs far more than their salary. Add recruitment spend, underperformance pay, exit costs, and replacement — a mis-hire typically runs 30–150% of first-year CTC.
Adjust the inputs and click
Calculate Total Cost
to see the breakdown
Use this free Cost of a Bad Hire Calculator to find out the true financial damage when a wrong hire doesn't work out. Most businesses underestimate this cost because they only look at the salary. In reality, a mis-hire bleeds money across four distinct areas: recruitment spend, wages paid for undelivered output, exit costs, and the expense of starting the hiring process all over again.
According to research by SHRM and the U.S. Department of Labor, a bad hire typically costs between 30% and 150% of the employee's first-year salary. For a mid-level role in India at ₹13 LPA, that means a potential loss of ₹4 lakh to ₹19.5 lakh — and that's a conservative estimate that doesn't include harder-to-quantify damage like team morale, lost clients, or wasted management time.
Rather than using a single percentage, this calculator breaks the total cost into four real expenses that every business actually pays:
Total Cost = Recruitment (Sunk) + Salary for Underperformance + Exit Costs + Replacement Recruitment
Note that the recruitment fee is effectively counted twice: once for the original (failed) hire and once for the replacement. The cost of the empty seat during the replacement search is a separate metric (cost of vacancy) and is intentionally excluded here to avoid double-counting.
A mid-level hire on ₹13 LPA who leaves after 6 months, delivered about 40% of expected output, and was sourced through a 12.5% agency fee:
Recruitment (sunk): ₹13,00,000 × 12.5% = ₹1,62,500
Underperformance: ₹1,08,333/month × 6 months × 60% wasted = ₹3,90,000
Exit costs (~2 months): ₹2,16,667
Replacement recruitment: ₹1,62,500
Total: ≈ ₹9.3 lakh — about 72% of first-year CTC
| Seniority Level | Typical CTC (₹ LPA) | Recruitment Fee (%) | Exit Cost (months) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Entry Level | 3–5 Lakh | 8% | ~1 month |
| Junior | 5–8 Lakh | 8.33% | ~1 month |
| Mid-Level | 10–16 Lakh | 12.5% | ~2 months |
| Senior | 16–25 Lakh | 15% | ~2 months |
| Lead | 22–30 Lakh | 15% | ~2.5 months |
| Manager | 28–40 Lakh | 18% | ~3 months |
| Director | 40–60 Lakh | 20% | ~3 months |
| Executive / CXO | 60–100+ Lakh | 25% | ~3 months |
To keep the estimates conservative and verifiable, this calculator deliberately excludes several real but harder-to-quantify costs:
When you add these up, the true cost of a bad hire is often significantly higher than the calculator's output.
A bad hire typically costs 30–150% of the role's first-year CTC. For a mid-level position at ₹13 lakh per annum, the total damage often falls between ₹8–10 lakh once you account for recruitment fees, salary paid during underperformance, exit costs, and the expense of hiring a replacement. Senior and executive roles run significantly higher.
The four components are: (1) the recruitment fee paid to hire the wrong person, (2) salary paid for output they didn't deliver while employed, (3) the exit cost including notice-period pay and any statutory severance, and (4) the recruitment fee again to hire a replacement. The recruitment expense is essentially paid twice.
30% of first-year salary is the floor estimate cited by the U.S. Department of Labor — it represents the minimum. SHRM and most HR research puts the cost of mid-level and senior bad hires at 100–150% of salary when underperformance, exit costs, and replacement are fully accounted for. The actual figure depends on tenure, seniority, and how far below expectations the employee performed.
Cost of vacancy measures the revenue and productivity lost while a position is unfilled. Cost of a bad hire measures what you lose when the position is filled by the wrong person — you pay full compensation for partial output, then pay again to exit and replace them. They are separate metrics, and many organisations end up paying both on the same role.
No, to keep estimates conservative and data-backed, training and onboarding costs are excluded. The same applies to lost clients, team morale impact, and management time. Including these would push the total significantly higher.
Structured, competency-based assessments are the most effective safeguard. Evaluating candidates on how they perform the actual work — through case studies, work samples, or scored assessments — dramatically reduces the chance of a mis-hire. The cost of assessing every candidate properly is almost always far less than the cost of one bad hire.